Tagged with Stanford Women’s Community Center

Let’s Talk About Consent

This piece originally posted on Femtastic.

by Mona Thompson, ’13

In the past few weeks, Stanford has been talking a lot about sexual assault in the context of Judicial Affairs and the Alternative Review Process (someone really cool and smart and talented even wrote an op-ed about it).

It seems like most of the opposition to specific points in the ARP comes from this justification of needing adequate protections for a man who is falsely accused of sexual assault and at risk of losing his precious Stanford education based on the false claims of some crazy or misinformed woman.  I’m not going to get into why we think women are falsely accusing men of sexual assault on campus (it seems like it would be a lot easier to get someone in trouble by falsely accusing them of almost anything else.  Like cheating).  But what I do want to talk about is: why are we so worried that men who do not think they assaulted someone will be accused of assault?

It seems that most of our worry over sexual assault comes from our own insecurities about consent. Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , , ,

Visions of Tomorrow: Academia still a boys’ club

This piece originally posted as an Opinion Editorial in The Stanford Daily.

by Miranda Mammen, ’14

Earlier this week, I received a Facebook invitation to Stanford 2020: Visions of Tomorrow. It looked awesome: “Come see 7 all-star professors talk about their research, why it matters, and what the world will look like in 2020.” I scanned the list of faculty with enthusiasm, noting how many of the professors I have admired or heard friends rave about.

But as I reached the end of the list, my enthusiasm quickly turned to confusion, then disgust. Of the seven faculty members who presented at Wednesday night’s symposium, exactly zero of them were women.

This level of gender disparity is unacceptable. And it’s particularly problematic for an event that explicitly looks toward the future. At last year’s symposium, there were two women; this year there are none. Maybe it’s just me, but in the future I’d like to see more gender equality, not less.

The more I thought about it, the more outrageous the discrepancy seemed. On Wednesday, I posted a sarcastic comment to the event page: “Visions of Tomorrow: Because in the future, there will be no female faculty.” Adam Adler ’12, who is listed as an event creator on the Facebook page, commented in response: “Because in the present, female faculty do not respond to email requests.” (He included a winky smiley face, too.)

It’s absurd and shameful that the nearly twenty groups that co-sponsored the event could not muster up even a single female faculty member to speak. Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , ,

Six established Stanford organizations I’d like to see supported before an ASSU candidate creates a new one

This piece originally posted on Femtastic.

by Mona Thompson, ’13

One of the things that frustrates me the most around ASSU election season is this desire everyone seems to have to invent new programs and new things.

Everyone on this campus is pretty smart.  Chances are if there is a current problem on campus, there is already a highly functioning group that is doing something to address it.  As Stanford students, we love to create new programs but we can be very bad at looking around us at the good work our peers are doing and supporting already existing programs.

So – more or less off the top of my head – here’s my list of Six established Stanford organizations I’d like to see supported before an ASSU candidate creates a new one: Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,556 other followers